Bud Hunt has
written a post. It talks about the the proliferation of groups and networks on in the blogosphere.
Here is some of what he has to say....
I'm noticing a proliferation of niche groups emerging in the edu'sphere -- groups of young folks, groups of women, etc. Something about this is rubbing me the wrong way -- but I can't quite put my finger on what it is.
I certainly admire the time and effort that people are putting into helping others find their way in the forest that is the Internet. But is their enough added value in these different subgroups, particularly among bloggers that are already networked, that makes their existence an asset rather than a collection of subdivisions, new walls keeping people separate? At what point does joining a group mean closing a door, rather than opening one? Or does it ever mean that at all? (I think that it does, sometimes.) Does the creation of lots of new groups lead to a further formalization of these spaces that are informal learning places? Are we perpetuating old ways of doing things in new spaces?
Here was my response to what he had to say.....
Hi I am a member of WOW. I joined because people who I respect and admire are taking the time to inform people who want to know about pedagogy and interesting tools to make teaching better for todays youth. I am a male who just wants to teach better.
WOW to my knowledge was created by 4 friends who wanted a place to share their experiences in the classroom. I have been an active participant in their post and pre skype shows.
The new net is a place where your creativity improves when you get a synergistic energy working with friends. Connecting with people from everywhere allows for a better finished project.
Groups/networks...... if it makes us push the boundaries of what we are willing to do and improve the education of todays youth then so be it.
If I recall the K12online conference was considered a group by some people. Look at all the good that has come and is still coming out of this Conference.
Thanks for a great post. I hope that teachers and bloggers everywhere just push the bar higher and show new and great things to do with our students.
People put up flags when they are worried about groups. I know
Graham has written about it in the past and
Stephen Downes has also written about it. If a group turns out to be a bad thing and influence in inappropriate ways then we need to take action.
I am of the opini0n that we need to collaborate as much as possible. Perhaps someone will correct me. If it makes us push the bar to new levels then the group, network has done its job.
As I have said already....k12online was considered a group by some. It has created change. Change for the good I think.
Thanks for reading. Bud thanks for making us think. Happy New Year.
ead many of either Vicky's or Buds blogs because both of them are pretty outfront in telling all that read them who they are and what their names are.
As I quickly skimmed the article I was struck with the topic. Many of these teacher "bloggers" have negative comments to say about their school, pupils or administrators. Anyone who bothers to leave a trail of comments and text behind in the blogosphere is foolish. This is one of the first rules of blogging that we teach the kids.
